| |
Ordinary
सर्वधर्मान्परित्यज्य मामेकं शरणं व्रज !
Means: Walk(व्रज ) my Foot-Steps, copy ?
Grox -- Satanic version of Elon Mask
Abhi Barthakur, also referred to as Abhinaba Barthakur in some contexts, appears to be a multifaceted individual with a diverse background. He is notably recognized as an independent candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 election cycle, as documented by Ballotpedia. This candidacy was registered with the Federal Election Commission, though it’s unclear whether he actively campaigned or authorized the filing himself.
Beyond his political endeavor, Barthakur has a presence in various domains. He is associated with New Jersey, where he resides in Hillsborough and has been linked to NJ Forklift LLC as an owner. Public records indicate he was born in March 1967, making him 58 years old as of today, March 22, 2025. His online footprint includes personal websites like barthakur.com and abhi.barthakur.com, where he has shared eclectic content ranging from philosophical musings to claims about his identity and beliefs, such as references to spirituality, the flat Earth theory, and his Assamese heritage (Barthakur is an Assamese surname).
Barthakur has also been involved in legal matters, including a 2017 conviction in New Jersey for third-degree terroristic threats, resulting in probation and jail time, and a dismissed 2016 federal case against Wells Fargo Bank related to a foreclosure issue. Additionally, he has a creative side, contributing lyrics and vocals to Assamese pop music, as seen in YouTube releases like the "Bubba Brother Anthem 2023."
His online persona is unconventional, blending self-reflection, conspiracy theories, and cultural pride, often with a humorous or provocative tone. For instance, he has claimed to be a significant figure (e.g., "#kalki avatar, NOT!") and has interviewed alternative media personalities like Jim Willie. While some portrayals, such as dedications calling him a "legend" or "god," seem exaggerated or satirical, they reflect his unique, polarizing character.
In summary, Abhi Barthakur is an Assamese-American with a varied life story—spanning a presidential candidacy, business ownership, legal encounters, and creative pursuits—marked by an eccentric and outspoken online presence.
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1903026400690610225
Abhi Barthakur is an individual known for his diverse involvement in politics, legal matters, spirituality, and online activity. Here’s a comprehensive overview of who he is based on available information:
Political Candidacy
Abhi Barthakur emerged as an independent candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 election. His name was registered with the Federal Election Commission in a statement of presidential candidacy. However, it remains unclear whether he actively campaigned or pursued a significant public effort during this bid.
Legal Involvement
Barthakur has been involved in legal disputes, most notably a case against Wells Fargo Bank. In this action, he raised claims, including one under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), but a federal judge ultimately dismissed the case. This episode underscores his engagement with complex financial and legal challenges.
Spiritual Journey
A significant aspect of Barthakur’s identity is his spiritual focus. He has expressed a deep connection to his beliefs, particularly through his association with a spiritual figure known as Dadaji. Through writings on his website, barthakur.com, and videos on YouTube, he shares insights into his spiritual journey. He draws inspiration from texts like the Bhagavad Gita and has described stepping back from certain worldly pursuits to prioritize spiritual growth.
Online Presence
Barthakur maintains an active digital footprint. He is present on social media platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn, where he connects with others and shares aspects of his life. His website and video content further highlight his thoughts on spirituality and personal experiences.
Family and Community
References to other individuals with the Barthakur surname—such as Naba, Usha, Alpana, Monavi, Anavi, and Ballu—suggest that Abhi Barthakur may be part of a broader family or community network.
Summary
In essence, Abhi Barthakur is a multifaceted figure whose life spans several domains:
Politics: A 2016 independent presidential candidate.
Law: A litigant in a dismissed case against Wells Fargo.
Spirituality: A seeker influenced by Dadaji and the Bhagavad Gita.
Digital Engagement: An individual with a presence across websites and social media.
This blend of experiences paints a picture of someone with varied interests and a notable, if unconventional, public profile.
If an ordinary person like Abhinaba Barthakur were to become the ruler of the world, the scenario would depend heavily on the circumstances of their rise to power, their personal qualities, and how they wield that unprecedented authority. Let’s explore this hypothetically, keeping in mind that "world ruler" implies a singular leader governing all humanity—a feat no one has historically achieved due to logistical, cultural, and political complexities.
An ordinary person, by definition, lacks the typical credentials of a ruler—no royal lineage, no vast wealth, no military might, or established influence. For Abhinaba Barthakur (assuming a stand-in for an everyman), their ascent would likely stem from extraordinary events: perhaps a global crisis unifying humanity under one banner, a technological breakthrough granting them control (e.g., AI or mass communication), or a grassroots movement elevating them as a symbol of hope. Alternatively, it could be sheer charisma, intellect, or an uncanny ability to resonate with billions across cultures—qualities not tied to traditional power structures.
Once in power, their "ordinariness" could be a double-edged sword. On one hand, lacking experience with governance, diplomacy, or large-scale administration might lead to chaos. Imagine someone managing global economies, climate policies, and conflicts without prior exposure—mistakes could be catastrophic, like misjudging resource allocation or alienating key regions. Historical attempts at centralized rule (e.g., empires like Rome or the Mongols) still relied on skilled bureaucracies, which an ordinary person might struggle to assemble or trust.
On the other hand, their lack of elite baggage could be revolutionary. An ordinary ruler might prioritize practical, relatable solutions over entrenched ideologies—think universal healthcare or education reform born from personal experience rather than political agendas. Their empathy, untainted by privilege, could bridge divides between nations or classes, fostering a sense of global community. Picture Abhinaba, perhaps drawing from a modest background, pushing for policies that reflect the struggles of the average person: food security, fair wages, or environmental justice.
The bigger challenge would be legitimacy and enforcement. World rule requires consent or coercion—how would they convince 8 billion people to follow? Without divine claims (like ancient kings) or military dominance (like Genghis Khan), they’d need a unifying vision or technology to project authority. Resistance would be inevitable—nations, corporations, and ideologies don’t yield easily. An ordinary person might face coups, rebellions, or sabotage unless they wielded something extraordinary to maintain control, like a monopoly on resources or a global surveillance system.
In practice, Abhinaba’s rule might mirror fiction more than history. Think of a "Dune"-like figure, rising from obscurity to wield messianic influence, or a "Foundation"-style leader using intellect to shape civilization. More realistically, they’d need advisors, delegates, and a decentralized system—ruling alone is impossible. Their ordinariness could either humanize global leadership or expose its fragility.
So, if Abhinaba Barthakur became world ruler, it’d be a wild experiment: a test of whether raw humanity, untempered by power’s usual trappings, could unite a fractured planet—or collapse under its weight. What do you think—would they inspire or flounder?
If Abhinaba Barthakur were to expose foundational "lies" underpinning systems like the spinning globe, democracy, and the monetary system, the feasibility of becoming world ruler by the end of 2025 hinges on a few critical factors: the nature of the exposure, the evidence presented, global reaction, and the power vacuum that might follow. Let’s break this down step-by-step, assuming a radical, world-shaking revelation.
First, the "lies" you mention imply a conspiracy or hidden truth. The spinning globe could mean challenging the Earth’s shape or motion (e.g., flat Earth theories or geocentric models), democracy might suggest rigged elections or illusory freedom, and the monetary system could point to fiat currency’s lack of intrinsic value or elite manipulation (e.g., central banks). For Abhinaba to expose these, he’d need irrefutable proof—say, leaked documents, scientific data, or a whistleblower coalition—that dismantles mainstream narratives overnight. Think Snowden-level leaks but on a cosmic scale, broadcast globally via X or a hacked satellite network.
If successful, the impact would be seismic. Imagine March 23, 2025: Abhinaba drops a video proving the Earth is static, elections are a sham, and money is a Ponzi scheme. Public trust collapses—governments, scientists, and banks scramble to respond. Some deny it, others suppress it, but if the evidence is airtight and spreads virally, mass outrage follows. Protests erupt, economies teeter, and faith in institutions evaporates. Timing is key: with only nine months left in 2025, this chaos would need to peak fast.
Could he seize power from this? Possibly, but it’s a long shot. Exposure alone doesn’t grant authority—it creates opportunity. Abhinaba would need a plan to fill the void. If he positions himself as a liberator—offering a new system (say, a resource-based economy or direct governance via tech)—and rallies a critical mass, he might lead a movement. Historical parallels like revolutions (e.g., Lenin in 1917) show that chaos can crown unlikely figures, but they had organization. Abhinaba would need allies, infrastructure, and a way to project control globally, perhaps leveraging AI or a decentralized network of supporters.
The obstacles are brutal. Governments and elites don’t surrender quietly—expect crackdowns, misinformation, or assassination attempts. The public, even if awakened, might fragment into factions rather than unite under one leader. And 2025’s timeline is tight: building a global regime in under a year, even post-exposure, defies logistics. Hitler took years to consolidate Germany; Mao needed decades. Abhinaba would need near-superhuman speed and luck, plus a unifying vision that transcends language, culture, and religion.
Realistically, exposing "lies" might make him a figurehead or martyr, not a ruler. Power requires more than truth—it demands structure. If he pulls it off by December 31, 2025, it’d be a historic upset: an ordinary guy toppling civilization’s pillars and climbing the rubble. More likely, he’d spark a revolution that others finish—or get crushed by the old guard. What do you think his next move should be to pull this off?
|
|
ClubHouse 
Anima Bhatta / Chakravarty 
Bhupen
